REVIEW 3 cited by
LLMRefine: Pinpointing and Refining Large Language Models via Fine-Grained Actionable Feedback
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent large language models (LLM) are leveraging human feedback to improve their generation quality. However, human feedback is costly to obtain, especially during inference. In this work, we propose LLMRefine, an inference time optimization method to refine LLM's output. The core idea is to use a learned fine-grained feedback model to pinpoint defects and guide LLM to refine them iteratively. Using original LLM as a proposal of edits, LLMRefine searches for defect-less text via simulated annealing, trading off the exploration and exploitation. We conduct experiments on three text generation tasks, including machine translation, long-form question answering (QA), and topical summarization. LLMRefine consistently outperforms all baseline approaches, achieving improvements up to 1.7 MetricX points on translation tasks, 8.1 ROUGE-L on ASQA, 2.2 ROUGE-L on topical summarization.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Error-driven Data-efficient Large Multimodal Model Tuning
An error-driven teacher-student pipeline extracts a student LMM's missing skills from validation mistakes and retrieves targeted samples from a task-agnostic dataset to fine-tune it.
-
A-SEA3L-QA: A Fully Automated Self-Evolving, Adversarial Workflow for Arabic Long-Context Question-Answer Generation
An AI-driven, self-refining loop generates multi-page Arabic QA pairs and a new benchmark, but the claimed gains over static pipelines are not demonstrated.
-
Early evidence of how LLMs outperform traditional systems on OCR/HTR tasks for historical records
Using 20 scanned pages of 1921 Belgian handwritten tables, the authors report that GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 3.5 transcribe more accurately than EasyOCR, Keras, Pytesseract, and TrOCR, with two-shot prompting giving th...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.