Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

GEO: Generative Engine Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.09735 v3 pith:W77G5BI3 submitted 2023-11-16 cs.LG cs.IR

classification cs.LGcs.IR
keywords generativeenginescontentenginecreatorsoptimizationqueriestextit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The advent of large language models (LLMs) has ushered in a new paradigm of search engines that use generative models to gather and summarize information to answer user queries. This emerging technology, which we formalize under the unified framework of generative engines (GEs), can generate accurate and personalized responses, rapidly replacing traditional search engines like Google and Bing. Generative Engines typically satisfy queries by synthesizing information from multiple sources and summarizing them using LLMs. While this shift significantly improves $\textit{user}$ utility and $\textit{generative search engine}$ traffic, it poses a huge challenge for the third stakeholder -- website and content creators. Given the black-box and fast-moving nature of generative engines, content creators have little to no control over $\textit{when}$ and $\textit{how}$ their content is displayed. With generative engines here to stay, we must ensure the creator economy is not disadvantaged. To address this, we introduce Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), the first novel paradigm to aid content creators in improving their content visibility in generative engine responses through a flexible black-box optimization framework for optimizing and defining visibility metrics. We facilitate systematic evaluation by introducing GEO-bench, a large-scale benchmark of diverse user queries across multiple domains, along with relevant web sources to answer these queries. Through rigorous evaluation, we demonstrate that GEO can boost visibility by up to $40\%$ in generative engine responses. Moreover, we show the efficacy of these strategies varies across domains, underscoring the need for domain-specific optimization methods. Our work opens a new frontier in information discovery systems, with profound implications for both developers of generative engines and content creators.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Agent-Facing Information Design in LLM Tool Registries

    cs.IR 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Legal puffery in tool descriptions fully steers LLM agent selection; disclosure fails, so registries should normalize selection-facing text and show marketing only after choice.

  2. Developer Experience with AI Coding Agents: HTTP Behavioral Signatures in Documentation Portals

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    AI coding agents produce identifiable HTTP behavioral signatures and compress multi-page navigation into one or two requests, rendering standard engagement metrics unreliable.

  3. Generative Engine Optimization: How to Dominate AI Search

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across hundreds of query comparisons, AI search engines systematically favor earned media over brand-owned and social sources, and vary strongly by engine and language.

  4. AI Answer Engine Citation Behavior An Empirical Analysis of the GEO16 Framework

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new audit framework, GEO-16, links 16 on-page quality signals to AI answer engine citations, identifying thresholds associated with higher citation odds.

Pith tools