Pith. sign in

REVIEW 9 cited by

Looped Transformers are Better at Learning Learning Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.12424 v3 pith:P4NY7OLZ submitted 2023-11-21 cs.LG cs.NE

classification cs.LGcs.NE
keywords transformeriterativelearningloopedalgorithmsarchitecturedata-fittingproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transformers have demonstrated effectiveness in in-context solving data-fitting problems from various (latent) models, as reported by Garg et al. However, the absence of an inherent iterative structure in the transformer architecture presents a challenge in emulating the iterative algorithms, which are commonly employed in traditional machine learning methods. To address this, we propose the utilization of looped transformer architecture and its associated training methodology, with the aim of incorporating iterative characteristics into the transformer architectures. Experimental results suggest that the looped transformer achieves performance comparable to the standard transformer in solving various data-fitting problems, while utilizing less than 10% of the parameter count.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Does Recurrence Become an Algorithm? Convergence Selection in Weight-Tied Looped Transformers

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Weight-tied looped transformers on group prefix products implement a linear computation frontier whose speed matches the training loop budget, and a new convergence-time instrument reveals it.

  2. Beyond Test-Time Memory: State-Space Optimal Control for LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A symplectic LQR layer inserted as an adapter into pretrained LLMs yields large gains on MATH-500, AMC and AIME by solving a latent optimal-control problem at inference time.

  3. Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Looped language models with latent iterative computation and entropy-regularized depth allocation achieve performance matching up to 12B standard LLMs through superior knowledge manipulation.

  4. Adaptive Depth in Looped Transformers: Diagnosing Learned Halting Gates and Trajectory Readouts

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In looped transformers, halting-gate failures come mainly from how gate training reshapes the trajectory; fixed-prior depth supervision plus simple confidence readouts yields better accuracy per unit of compute.

  5. ELT: Elastic Looped Transformers for Visual Generation

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Weight-shared looped transformers trained with intra-loop self-distillation match MaskGIT-class FID/FVD at roughly 4x fewer parameters and support any-time inference across loop counts.

  6. Latent Reasoning in TRMs is Secretly a Policy Improvement Operator

    cs.CL 2025-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Recursive reasoning in TRMs is reinterpreted as policy improvement, and a stepwise denoising supervision scheme (DIS) cuts forward passes 18× while improving small-model ARC scores.

  7. Fast and Simplex: 2-Simplicial Attention in Triton

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    2-simplicial attention, implemented in Triton with a sliding window, is claimed to yield a steeper loss-versus-parameters scaling exponent than dot-product attention on math and reasoning benchmarks.

  8. Skip a Layer or Loop it? Test-Time Depth Adaptation of Pretrained LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Pretrained LLM layers can be skipped/repeated per input to build custom paths, but the search uses ground-truth answers, so the accuracy gains are fitted, not predicted.

  9. A Survey on Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    Recent advances in LLM mathematical reasoning are organized into comprehension and generation phases, covering methods from prompting to test-time scaling.

Pith tools