Development of a Legal Document AI-Chatbot

Aaryav Gangrade; Manoj Kumar R; Pranav Nataraj Devaraj; Rakesh Teja P V

Development of a Legal Document AI-Chatbot

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.12719 v1 pith:6IYFOWUS submitted 2023-11-21 cs.AI

Pranav Nataraj Devaraj , Rakesh Teja P V , Aaryav Gangrade , Manoj Kumar R This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.AI

keywords legalchatbotcomponentdevelopmentdocumentationpresentedai-chatbotandroid

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

0 comments

read the original abstract

With the exponential growth of digital data and the increasing complexity of legal documentation, there is a pressing need for efficient and intelligent tools to streamline the handling of legal documents.With the recent developments in the AI field, especially in chatbots, it cannot be ignored as a very compelling solution to this problem.An insight into the process of creating a Legal Documentation AI Chatbot with as many relevant features as possible within the given time frame is presented.The development of each component of the chatbot is presented in detail.Each component's workings and functionality has been discussed.Starting from the build of the Android app and the Langchain query processing code till the integration of both through a Flask backend and REST API methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Rhetorical-Role-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Legal Question Answering over Indian Supreme Court Judgments
cs.IR 2026-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

A rhetorical-role-aware RAG system for Indian Supreme Court judgments is described, but its effectiveness claim is unsupported by baselines, ablations, or human evaluation.

Pith tools