Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Prompting Frameworks for Large Language Models: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.12785 v1 pith:OIXTUC2Q submitted 2023-11-21 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords levelllmsfieldlanguagelargemodelspromptingchatgpt
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Since the launch of ChatGPT, a powerful AI Chatbot developed by OpenAI, large language models (LLMs) have made significant advancements in both academia and industry, bringing about a fundamental engineering paradigm shift in many areas. While LLMs are powerful, it is also crucial to best use their power where "prompt'' plays a core role. However, the booming LLMs themselves, including excellent APIs like ChatGPT, have several inherent limitations: 1) temporal lag of training data, and 2) the lack of physical capabilities to perform external actions. Recently, we have observed the trend of utilizing prompt-based tools to better utilize the power of LLMs for downstream tasks, but a lack of systematic literature and standardized terminology, partly due to the rapid evolution of this field. Therefore, in this work, we survey related prompting tools and promote the concept of the "Prompting Framework" (PF), i.e. the framework for managing, simplifying, and facilitating interaction with large language models. We define the lifecycle of the PF as a hierarchical structure, from bottom to top, namely: Data Level, Base Level, Execute Level, and Service Level. We also systematically depict the overall landscape of the emerging PF field and discuss potential future research and challenges. To continuously track the developments in this area, we maintain a repository at https://github.com/lxx0628/Prompting-Framework-Survey, which can be a useful resource sharing platform for both academic and industry in this field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PATENTWRITER: A Benchmarking Study for Patent Drafting with LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper introduces the first unified benchmark for LLM-generated patent abstracts and reports that GPT-4o and Llama 3 produce abstracts with high BERTScore and useful downstream task performance.

  2. Instruction Learning Paradigms: A Dual Perspective on White-box and Black-box LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A hybrid black-box and white-box instruction optimizer, built on InstructZero and INSTINCT, reports the highest mean score on 30 tasks but with small margins, missing error bars, and unreleased code.

  3. LLM Access Shield: Domain-Specific LLM Framework for Privacy Policy Compliance

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An enterprise proxy that detects sensitive data in LLM prompts with a fine-tuned small model and replaces it with format-preserving encryption.

  4. Advancing Responsible Innovation in Agentic AI: A study of Ethical Frameworks for Household Automation

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review that argues ethical principles for household agentic AI must be converted into concrete design patterns for tailored explainability, granular consent, and user override, especially for vulnerable groups.

Pith tools