Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can LLMs Fix Issues with Reasoning Models? Towards More Likely Models for AI Planning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.13720 v2 pith:EROEFFFN submitted 2023-11-22 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords modelplanningspacetasksllmsmodelsapproachbeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This is the first work to look at the application of large language models (LLMs) for the purpose of model space edits in automated planning tasks. To set the stage for this union, we explore two different flavors of model space problems that have been studied in the AI planning literature and explore the effect of an LLM on those tasks. We empirically demonstrate how the performance of an LLM contrasts with combinatorial search (CS) -- an approach that has been traditionally used to solve model space tasks in planning, both with the LLM in the role of a standalone model space reasoner as well as in the role of a statistical signal in concert with the CS approach as part of a two-stage process. Our experiments show promising results suggesting further forays of LLMs into the exciting world of model space reasoning for planning tasks in the future.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Model-Based AI planning and Execution Systems for Robotics

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    A structured survey of model-based AI planning and execution systems for robotics, comparing ROSPlan, CLIPS Executive, PlanSys2, SkiROS2, the Skill-Based Architecture, and AOS, and proposing a future research agenda.

Pith tools