Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

GPT4Vis: What Can GPT-4 Do for Zero-shot Visual Recognition?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.15732 v2 pith:PWGZEE43 submitted 2023-11-27 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords gpt-4visualrecognitionacrossdatasetszero-shotaccuracydescriptions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper does not present a novel method. Instead, it delves into an essential, yet must-know baseline in light of the latest advancements in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI): the utilization of GPT-4 for visual understanding. Our study centers on the evaluation of GPT-4's linguistic and visual capabilities in zero-shot visual recognition tasks: Firstly, we explore the potential of its generated rich textual descriptions across various categories to enhance recognition performance without any training. Secondly, we evaluate GPT-4's visual proficiency in directly recognizing diverse visual content. We conducted extensive experiments to systematically evaluate GPT-4's performance across images, videos, and point clouds, using 16 benchmark datasets to measure top-1 and top-5 accuracy. Our findings show that GPT-4, enhanced with rich linguistic descriptions, significantly improves zero-shot recognition, offering an average top-1 accuracy increase of 7% across all datasets. GPT-4 excels in visual recognition, outshining OpenAI-CLIP's ViT-L and rivaling EVA-CLIP's ViT-E, particularly in video datasets HMDB-51 and UCF-101, where it leads by 22% and 9%, respectively. We hope this research contributes valuable data points and experience for future studies. We release our code at https://github.com/whwu95/GPT4Vis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Med-Banana: Learning Quality-Controlled Medical Image Editing from Success-and-Failure Trajectories

    cs.CV 2025-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Med-Banana-50K is a dataset of ~88K AI-generated medical image edits (accepts and rejects) across 23 diseases, labeled by a single commercial LLM judge with minimal expert validation.

  2. Prompt Engineering for Requirements Engineering: A Literature Review and Roadmap

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The first roadmap-oriented systematic literature review of prompt engineering for requirements engineering analyzes 35 studies and proposes a hybrid taxonomy and research roadmap.

Pith tools