REVIEW 7 cited by
Mitigating Hallucination in Visual Language Models with Visual Supervision
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) suffer from hallucination a lot, generating responses that apparently contradict to the image content occasionally. The key problem lies in its weak ability to comprehend detailed content in a multi-modal context, which can be mainly attributed to two factors in training data and loss function. The vision instruction dataset primarily focuses on global description, and the auto-regressive loss function favors text modeling rather than image understanding. In this paper, we bring more detailed vision annotations and more discriminative vision models to facilitate the training of LVLMs, so that they can generate more precise responses without encounter hallucination. On one hand, we generate image-text pairs with detailed relationship annotations in panoptic scene graph dataset (PSG). These conversations pay more attention on detailed facts in the image, encouraging the model to answer questions based on multi-modal contexts. On the other hand, we integrate SAM and mask prediction loss as auxiliary supervision, forcing the LVLMs to have the capacity to identify context-related objects, so that they can generate more accurate responses, mitigating hallucination. Moreover, to provide a deeper evaluation on the hallucination in LVLMs, we propose a new benchmark, RAH-Bench. It divides vision hallucination into three different types that contradicts the image with wrong categories, attributes or relations, and introduces False Positive Rate as detailed sub-metric for each type. In this benchmark, our approach demonstrates an +8.4% enhancement compared to original LLaVA and achieves widespread performance improvements across other models.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
INTER: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models by Interaction Guidance Sampling
INTER is a training-free logit-correction method that adds Harsanyi interaction scores to selected keyword tokens, lowering hallucination on six LVLM benchmarks.
-
ONLY: One-Layer Intervention Sufficiently Mitigates Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models
A single-layer, single-query intervention that amplifies attention heads with high text-to-visual entropy reduces hallucination in LVLMs at about 1.07x the inference time of regular decoding.
-
MIRAGE: Assessing Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Chains of MLLM
MIRAGE is a benchmark that separates reasoning hallucinations from perception errors in multimodal LLMs, and Logos is a curriculum reinforcement fine-tuning method that reduces logical hallucinations.
-
Do You Keep an Eye on What I Ask? Mitigating Multimodal Hallucination via Attention-Guided Ensemble Decoding
Ensemble Decoding reduces object hallucination in large vision-language models by ensembling logits from attention-weighted image sub-images.
-
Self-Correcting Decoding with Generative Feedback for Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models
DeGF reduces hallucinations in vision-language models by generating an image from the model's own response and using the divergence between predictions on original and generated images to switch between complementary ...
-
Dual-Stage Value-Guided Inference with Margin-Based Reward Adjustment for Fast and Faithful VLM Captioning
A two-stage, value-guided decoding strategy with a margin-based reward adjustment is claimed to yield more faithful, detailed VLM captions at about a quarter of VisVM's inference cost.
-
Empowering Multimodal LLMs with External Tools: A Comprehensive Survey
A survey paper maps how external tools are used to augment multimodal large language models across data, tasks, evaluation, and future directions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.