Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Pre-registration for Predictive Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.18807 v1 pith:VDAXWOI7 submitted 2023-11-30 cs.LG stat.ME

classification cs.LGstat.ME
keywords modelingpre-registrationpredictiveaddresslearninglimitationsmachinepractices
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Amid rising concerns of reproducibility and generalizability in predictive modeling, we explore the possibility and potential benefits of introducing pre-registration to the field. Despite notable advancements in predictive modeling, spanning core machine learning tasks to various scientific applications, challenges such as overlooked contextual factors, data-dependent decision-making, and unintentional re-use of test data have raised questions about the integrity of results. To address these issues, we propose adapting pre-registration practices from explanatory modeling to predictive modeling. We discuss current best practices in predictive modeling and their limitations, introduce a lightweight pre-registration template, and present a qualitative study with machine learning researchers to gain insight into the effectiveness of pre-registration in preventing biased estimates and promoting more reliable research outcomes. We conclude by exploring the scope of problems that pre-registration can address in predictive modeling and acknowledging its limitations within this context.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Safety Under Scaffolding: How Evaluation Conditions Shape Measured Safety

    cs.SE 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Map-reduce scaffolding degrades measured safety mainly by stripping multiple-choice options (40–89% of the loss is format conversion); scaffold architecture explains only 0.4% of variance and composite safety scores h...

  2. Measurement as Bricolage: Examining How Data Scientists Construct Target Variables for Predictive Modeling Tasks

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Data scientists construct prediction targets through bricolage, applying five reformulation strategies (piggybacking, composing, swapping, bridging, refining) to balance five criteria: validity, simplicity, predictabi...

  3. Not All Explanations for Deep Learning Phenomena Are Equally Valuable

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper arguing that narrow, puzzle-solving explanations of deep learning edge case phenomena are low-value, and that these phenomena should instead be used to stress-test broad explanatory theories.

Pith tools