Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Comparative Analysis of Multilingual Text Classification & Identification through Deep Learning and Embedding Visualization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.03789 v1 pith:UTH7SRLY submitted 2023-12-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords classificationmultilingualfasttexttextvisualizationclusteringcomparativedeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This research conducts a comparative study on multilingual text classification methods, utilizing deep learning and embedding visualization. The study employs LangDetect, LangId, FastText, and Sentence Transformer on a dataset encompassing 17 languages. It explores dimensionality's impact on clustering, revealing FastText's clearer clustering in 2D visualization due to its extensive multilingual corpus training. Notably, the FastText multi-layer perceptron model achieved remarkable accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, outperforming the Sentence Transformer model. The study underscores the effectiveness of these techniques in multilingual text classification, emphasizing the importance of large multilingual corpora for training embeddings. It lays the groundwork for future research and assists practitioners in developing language detection and classification systems. Additionally, it includes the comparison of multi-layer perceptron, LSTM, and Convolution models for classification.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MMATH: A Multilingual Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new multilingual math benchmark shows that reasoning models often respond in the wrong language, and English-reasoning training improves both accuracy and language consistency.

Pith tools