Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Benchmarks for Physical Reasoning AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.10728 v1 pith:KBJQV6W2 submitted 2023-12-17 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords benchmarksphysicalreasoningconceptsapproachescomprehensiveensemblegeneralist
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Physical reasoning is a crucial aspect in the development of general AI systems, given that human learning starts with interacting with the physical world before progressing to more complex concepts. Although researchers have studied and assessed the physical reasoning of AI approaches through various specific benchmarks, there is no comprehensive approach to evaluating and measuring progress. Therefore, we aim to offer an overview of existing benchmarks and their solution approaches and propose a unified perspective for measuring the physical reasoning capacity of AI systems. We select benchmarks that are designed to test algorithmic performance in physical reasoning tasks. While each of the selected benchmarks poses a unique challenge, their ensemble provides a comprehensive proving ground for an AI generalist agent with a measurable skill level for various physical reasoning concepts. This gives an advantage to such an ensemble of benchmarks over other holistic benchmarks that aim to simulate the real world by intertwining its complexity and many concepts. We group the presented set of physical reasoning benchmarks into subcategories so that more narrow generalist AI agents can be tested first on these groups.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multilingual Performance of a Multimodal Artificial Intelligence System on Multisubject Physics Concept Inventories

    physics.ed-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GPT-4o averaged 71% on English physics concept inventories, outperformed average post-instruction undergraduates in most subjects but not laboratory skills, and scored far worse on image-dependent items and in non-Wes...

Pith tools