REVIEW 1 cited by
A Survey on Model-heterogeneous Federated Learning: Problems, Methods, and Prospects
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As privacy concerns continue to grow, federated learning (FL) has gained significant attention as a promising privacy-preserving technology, leading to considerable advancements in recent years. Unlike traditional machine learning, which requires central data collection, FL keeps data localized on user devices. However, conventional FL assumes that all clients operate with identical model structures initialized by the server. In real-world applications, system heterogeneity is common, with clients possessing varying computational capabilities. This disparity can hinder training for resource-limited clients and result in inefficient resource use for those with greater processing power. To address this challenge, model-heterogeneous FL has been introduced, enabling clients to train models of varying complexity based on their hardware resources. This paper reviews state-of-the-art approaches in model-heterogeneous FL, analyzing their strengths and weaknesses, while identifying open challenges and future research directions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey to specifically focus on model-heterogeneous FL.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Warming Up for Zeroth-Order Federated Pre-Training with Low Resource Clients
A warm-up phase of ordinary federated training followed by zeroth-order forward-pass-only updates lets low-resource clients participate in federated pre-training from random initialization.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.