Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparative Evaluation of Anomaly Detection Methods for Fraud Detection in Online Credit Card Payments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.13896 v1 pith:FLKK57TU submitted 2023-12-21 cs.LG q-fin.ST

classification cs.LGq-fin.ST
keywords methodsdetectiondistributionfraudlightgbmperformanceanomalycard
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study explores the application of anomaly detection (AD) methods in imbalanced learning tasks, focusing on fraud detection using real online credit card payment data. We assess the performance of several recent AD methods and compare their effectiveness against standard supervised learning methods. Offering evidence of distribution shift within our dataset, we analyze its impact on the tested models' performances. Our findings reveal that LightGBM exhibits significantly superior performance across all evaluated metrics but suffers more from distribution shifts than AD methods. Furthermore, our investigation reveals that LightGBM also captures the majority of frauds detected by AD methods. This observation challenges the potential benefits of ensemble methods to combine supervised, and AD approaches to enhance performance. In summary, this research provides practical insights into the utility of these techniques in real-world scenarios, showing LightGBM's superiority in fraud detection while highlighting challenges related to distribution shifts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools