REVIEW 2 cited by
BlackboxBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Black-box Adversarial Attacks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Adversarial examples are well-known tools to evaluate the vulnerability of deep neural networks (DNNs). Although lots of adversarial attack algorithms have been developed, it's still challenging in the practical scenario that the model's parameters and architectures are inaccessible to the attacker/evaluator, i.e., black-box adversarial attacks. Due to the practical importance, there has been rapid progress from recent algorithms, reflected by the quick increase in attack success rate and quick decrease in query numbers to the target model. However, there lacks thorough evaluations and comparisons among these algorithms, causing difficulties in tracking the real progress, analyzing advantages and disadvantages of different technical routes, as well as designing future development roadmap of this field. Thus, we aim at building a comprehensive benchmark of black-box adversarial attacks, called BlackboxBench. It mainly provides: 1) a unified, extensible and modular-based codebase, implementing 29 query-based attack algorithms and 30 transfer-based attack algorithms; 2) comprehensive evaluations: we evaluate the implemented algorithms against several mainstreaming model architectures on 2 widely used datasets (CIFAR-10 and a subset of ImageNet), leading to 14,950 evaluations in total; 3) thorough analysis and new insights, as well analytical tools. The website and source codes of BlackboxBench are available at https://blackboxbenchmark.github.io/ and https://github.com/SCLBD/BlackboxBench/, respectively.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Large-scale Testing Global Optimization Methods with Black-box Adversarial Attacks
The paper proposes black-box adversarial attacks on image classifiers as a high-dimensional benchmark for global optimization and compares seven metaheuristics under shared query budgets.
-
Consensus-based optimization for closed-box adversarial attacks and a connection to evolution strategies
Consensus-based optimization matches or beats natural evolution strategies as a closed-box adversarial attack method in easier attack scenarios, and consensus hopping is shown to be a gradient-descent-like limit of CBO.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.