Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On the Prospects of Incorporating Large Language Models (LLMs) in Automated Planning and Scheduling (APS)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.02500 v2 pith:DUYECPQO submitted 2024-01-04 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords planningllmsautomatedapproachaspectsexistingintegrationlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automated Planning and Scheduling is among the growing areas in Artificial Intelligence (AI) where mention of LLMs has gained popularity. Based on a comprehensive review of 126 papers, this paper investigates eight categories based on the unique applications of LLMs in addressing various aspects of planning problems: language translation, plan generation, model construction, multi-agent planning, interactive planning, heuristics optimization, tool integration, and brain-inspired planning. For each category, we articulate the issues considered and existing gaps. A critical insight resulting from our review is that the true potential of LLMs unfolds when they are integrated with traditional symbolic planners, pointing towards a promising neuro-symbolic approach. This approach effectively combines the generative aspects of LLMs with the precision of classical planning methods. By synthesizing insights from existing literature, we underline the potential of this integration to address complex planning challenges. Our goal is to encourage the ICAPS community to recognize the complementary strengths of LLMs and symbolic planners, advocating for a direction in automated planning that leverages these synergistic capabilities to develop more advanced and intelligent planning systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Specifications: The missing link to making the development of LLM systems an engineering discipline

    cs.SE 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper argues that clearer statement and solution specifications are the key to making LLM system development an engineering discipline, without providing new experimental evidence.

  2. GenPlanX. Generation of Plans and Execution

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    GenPlanX couples an LLM-based natural-language to PDDL translation with a classical planner and an execution monitor to solve office automation tasks with plan guarantees.

Pith tools