REVIEW 1 cited by
Exhaustive generation of edge-girth-regular graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Edge-girth-regular graphs (abbreviated as $egr$ graphs) are a class of highly regular graphs. More specifically, for integers $v$, $k$, $g$ and $\lambda$ an $egr(v,k,g,\lambda)$ graph is a $k$-regular graph with girth $g$ on $v$ vertices such that every edge is contained in exactly $\lambda$ cycles of length $g$. The central problem in this paper is determining $n(k,g,\lambda)$, which is defined as the smallest integer $v$ such that an $egr(v,k,g,\lambda)$ graph exists (or $\infty$ if no such graph exists) as well as determining the corresponding extremal graphs. We propose a linear time algorithm for computing how often an edge is contained in a cycle of length $g$, given a graph with girth $g$. We use this as one of the building blocks to propose another algorithm that can exhaustively generate all $egr(v,k,g,\lambda)$ graphs for fixed parameters $v, k, g$ and $\lambda$. We implement this algorithm and use it in a large-scale computation to obtain several new extremal graphs and improvements for lower and upper bounds from the literature for $n(k,g,\lambda)$. Among others, we show that $n(3,6,2)=24, n(3,8,8)=40, n(3,9,6)=60, n(3,9,8)=60, n(4,5,1)=30, n(4,6,9)=35, n(6,5,20)=42$ and we disprove a conjecture made by Araujo-Pardo and Leemans [Discrete Math. 345(10):112991 (2022)] for the cubic girth 8 and girth 12 cases. Based on our computations, we conjecture that $n(3,7,6)=n(3,8,10)=n(3,8,12)=n(3,8,14)=\infty.$
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Computational methods for finding bi-regular cages
The paper reports exhaustive lists of bi-regular cages for 24 parameter triples, improves the lower bound for ({4,5};7) from 66 to 69, and improves 122 upper bounds.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.