Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MEA-Defender: A Robust Watermark against Model Extraction Attack

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.15239 v1 pith:UDANP6S5 submitted 2024-01-26 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords modelwatermarkextractiondomainsamplesinputlearningmain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, numerous highly-valuable Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have been trained using deep learning algorithms. To protect the Intellectual Property (IP) of the original owners over such DNN models, backdoor-based watermarks have been extensively studied. However, most of such watermarks fail upon model extraction attack, which utilizes input samples to query the target model and obtains the corresponding outputs, thus training a substitute model using such input-output pairs. In this paper, we propose a novel watermark to protect IP of DNN models against model extraction, named MEA-Defender. In particular, we obtain the watermark by combining two samples from two source classes in the input domain and design a watermark loss function that makes the output domain of the watermark within that of the main task samples. Since both the input domain and the output domain of our watermark are indispensable parts of those of the main task samples, the watermark will be extracted into the stolen model along with the main task during model extraction. We conduct extensive experiments on four model extraction attacks, using five datasets and six models trained based on supervised learning and self-supervised learning algorithms. The experimental results demonstrate that MEA-Defender is highly robust against different model extraction attacks, and various watermark removal/detection approaches.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LoRAGuard: An Effective Black-box Watermarking Approach for LoRAs

    cs.CR 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A black-box watermarking method using paired positive and negative backdoor triggers and shadow-LoRA training to keep detection working under LoRA addition, negation, and multi-LoRA merging.

Pith tools