Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Large Language Model for Vulnerability Detection: Emerging Results and Future Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.15468 v1 pith:LVYSHWFS submitted 2024-01-27 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords llmsdetectionstate-of-the-artvulnerabilitygpt-3gpt-4languagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Previous learning-based vulnerability detection methods relied on either medium-sized pre-trained models or smaller neural networks from scratch. Recent advancements in Large Pre-Trained Language Models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable few-shot learning capabilities in various tasks. However, the effectiveness of LLMs in detecting software vulnerabilities is largely unexplored. This paper aims to bridge this gap by exploring how LLMs perform with various prompts, particularly focusing on two state-of-the-art LLMs: GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. Our experimental results showed that GPT-3.5 achieves competitive performance with the prior state-of-the-art vulnerability detection approach and GPT-4 consistently outperformed the state-of-the-art.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VISION: Robust and Interpretable Code Vulnerability Detection Leveraging Counterfactual Augmentation

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-generated counterfactual code pairs with flipped vulnerability labels, used to train a GNN, sharply improve CWE-20 detection and attribution on the released CWE-20-CFA benchmark.

  2. Large Language Models for In-File Vulnerability Localization Can Be "Lost in the End"

    cs.SE 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Large language models detect in-file vulnerabilities best when the vulnerable code appears early in the file, a 'lost-in-the-end' effect, and chunking files into smaller blocks can increase recall.

Pith tools