Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Inference for Two-Stage Extremum Estimators

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.05030 v2 pith:HRFIH56O submitted 2024-02-07 econ.EM

classification econ.EM
keywords estimatorstwo-stageapproachestimatorextremuminferencedistributionmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a simulation-based inference approach for two-stage estimators, focusing on extremum estimators in the second stage. We accommodate a broad range of first-stage estimators, including extremum estimators, high-dimensional estimators, and other types of estimators such as Bayesian estimators. The key contribution of our approach lies in its ability to estimate the asymptotic distribution of two-stage estimators, even when the distributions of both the first- and second-stage estimators are non-normal and when the second-stage estimator's bias, scaled by the square root of the sample size, does not vanish asymptotically. This enables reliable inference in situations where standard methods fail. Additionally, we propose a debiased estimator, based on the mean of the estimated distribution function, which exhibits improved finite sample properties. Unlike resampling methods, our approach avoids the need for multiple calculations of the two-stage estimator. We illustrate the effectiveness of our method in an empirical application on peer effects in adolescent fast-food consumption, where we address the issue of biased instrumental variable estimates resulting from many weak instruments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantile Peer Effect Models

    econ.EM 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Peer effects are estimated separately for low, middle, and high outcome peers, revealing non-monotonic influence patterns that linear-in-means and CES models cannot capture.

  2. Estimating Peer Effects Using Partial Network Data

    econ.EM 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new SGMM and a Bayesian estimator recover peer effects from partially observed networks, and show that Add Health data errors bias the estimated peer effect downward by roughly a third.

Pith tools