Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

AdaBatchGrad: Combining Adaptive Batch Size and Adaptive Step Size

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.05264 v1 pith:JMHSAZXB submitted 2024-02-07 cs.LG math.OC

classification cs.LGmath.OC
keywords sizeadaptivebatchstepadabatchgradtestsvarepsilongradient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

This paper presents a novel adaptation of the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), termed AdaBatchGrad. This modification seamlessly integrates an adaptive step size with an adjustable batch size. An increase in batch size and a decrease in step size are well-known techniques to tighten the area of convergence of SGD and decrease its variance. A range of studies by R. Byrd and J. Nocedal introduced various testing techniques to assess the quality of mini-batch gradient approximations and choose the appropriate batch sizes at every step. Methods that utilized exact tests were observed to converge within $O(LR^2/\varepsilon)$ iterations. Conversely, inexact test implementations sometimes resulted in non-convergence and erratic performance. To address these challenges, AdaBatchGrad incorporates both adaptive batch and step sizes, enhancing the method's robustness and stability. For exact tests, our approach converges in $O(LR^2/\varepsilon)$ iterations, analogous to standard gradient descent. For inexact tests, it achieves convergence in $O(\max\lbrace LR^2/\varepsilon, \sigma^2 R^2/\varepsilon^2 \rbrace )$ iterations. This makes AdaBatchGrad markedly more robust and computationally efficient relative to prevailing methods. To substantiate the efficacy of our method, we experimentally show, how the introduction of adaptive step size and adaptive batch size gradually improves the performance of regular SGD. The results imply that AdaBatchGrad surpasses alternative methods, especially when applied to inexact tests.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptive Batch Size Schedules for Distributed Training of Language Models with Data and Model Parallelism

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Adaptive batch size schedules based on the norm test can run with FSDP-distributed Llama-style pretraining, but the reported runs do not consistently beat constant batch sizes and the convergence theorem does not cove...

Pith tools