REVIEW 1 cited by
SWITCH: An Exemplar for Evaluating Self-Adaptive ML-Enabled Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Addressing runtime uncertainties in Machine Learning-Enabled Systems (MLS) is crucial for maintaining Quality of Service (QoS). The Machine Learning Model Balancer is a concept that addresses these uncertainties by facilitating dynamic ML model switching, showing promise in improving QoS in MLS. Leveraging this concept, this paper introduces SWITCH, an exemplar developed to enhance self-adaptive capabilities in such systems through dynamic model switching in runtime. SWITCH is designed as a comprehensive web service catering to a broad range of ML scenarios, with its implementation demonstrated through an object detection use case. SWITCH provides researchers with a flexible platform to apply and evaluate their ML model switching strategies, aiming to enhance QoS in MLS. SWITCH features advanced input handling, real-time data processing, and logging for adaptation metrics supplemented with an interactive real-time dashboard for enhancing system observability. This paper details SWITCH's architecture, self-adaptation strategies through ML model switching, and its empirical validation through a case study, illustrating its potential to improve QoS in MLS. By enabling a hands-on approach to explore adaptive behaviors in ML systems, SWITCH contributes a valuable tool to the SEAMS community for research into self-adaptive mechanisms for MLS and their practical applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
EdgeMLBalancer: A Self-Adaptive Approach for Dynamic Model Switching on Resource-Constrained Edge Devices
EdgeMLBalancer uses epsilon-greedy switching among four edge object-detection models, driven by CPU usage and confidence, and reports better accuracy and fairness than two baselines in a single 30-minute smartphone trial.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.