Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Forecasting high-impact research topics via machine learning on evolving knowledge graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.08640 v4 pith:VABLZMF3 submitted 2024-02-13 cs.DL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.DLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords impactideaspredictresearchscientificevolvingfuturenetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The exponential growth in scientific publications poses a severe challenge for human researchers. It forces attention to more narrow sub-fields, which makes it challenging to discover new impactful research ideas and collaborations outside one's own field. While there are ways to predict a scientific paper's future citation counts, they need the research to be finished and the paper written, usually assessing impact long after the idea was conceived. Here we show how to predict the impact of onsets of ideas that have never been published by researchers. For that, we developed a large evolving knowledge graph built from more than 21 million scientific papers. It combines a semantic network created from the content of the papers and an impact network created from the historic citations of papers. Using machine learning, we can predict the dynamic of the evolving network into the future with high accuracy (AUC values beyond 0.9 for most experiments), and thereby the impact of new research directions. We envision that the ability to predict the impact of new ideas will be a crucial component of future artificial muses that can inspire new impactful and interesting scientific ideas.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Toward Reliable Scientific Hypothesis Generation: Evaluating Truthfulness and Hallucination in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark (TruthHypo) and a knowledge-grounded hallucination detector (KnowHD) show that grounding scores can partially select truthful LLM-generated biomedical hypotheses, but the result is at risk from knowled...

Pith tools