Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

TrustScore: Reference-Free Evaluation of LLM Response Trustworthiness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.12545 v2 pith:NWPPO5TY submitted 2024-02-19 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords trustscorellmsknowledgemetricsreference-freeresponseresultstrustworthiness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various domains, prompting a surge in their practical applications. However, concerns have arisen regarding the trustworthiness of LLMs outputs, particularly in closed-book question-answering tasks, where non-experts may struggle to identify inaccuracies due to the absence of contextual or ground truth information. This paper introduces TrustScore, a framework based on the concept of Behavioral Consistency, which evaluates whether an LLMs response aligns with its intrinsic knowledge. Additionally, TrustScore can seamlessly integrate with fact-checking methods, which assesses alignment with external knowledge sources. The experimental results show that TrustScore achieves strong correlations with human judgments, surpassing existing reference-free metrics, and achieving results on par with reference-based metrics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Aligning Large Language Models for Faithful Integrity Against Opposing Argument

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An LLM is fine-tuned with DPO to make the strength of its stance in conversation match its self-estimated confidence, improving resistance to misleading arguments and receptiveness to corrections.

Pith tools