Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Recursive Speculative Decoding: Accelerating LLM Inference via Sampling Without Replacement

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.14160 v2 pith:OVOA424S submitted 2024-02-21 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords treecomputationaldecodingfixedreplacementspeculativewithoutdraft
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Speculative decoding is an inference-acceleration method for large language models (LLMs) where a small language model generates a draft-token sequence which is further verified by the target LLM in parallel. Recent works have advanced this method by establishing a draft-token tree, achieving superior performance over a single-sequence speculative decoding. However, those works independently generate tokens at each level of the tree, not leveraging the tree's entire diversifiability. Besides, their empirical superiority has been shown for fixed length of sequences, implicitly granting more computational resource to LLM for the tree-based methods. None of the existing works has conducted empirical studies with fixed target computational budgets despite its importance to resource-bounded devices. We present Recursive Speculative Decoding (RSD), a novel tree-based method that samples draft tokens without replacement and maximizes the diversity of the tree. During RSD's drafting, the tree is built by either Gumbel-Top-$k$ trick that draws tokens without replacement in parallel or Stochastic Beam Search that samples sequences without replacement while early-truncating unlikely draft sequences and reducing the computational cost of LLM. We empirically evaluate RSD with Llama 2 and OPT models, showing that RSD outperforms the baseline methods, consistently for fixed draft sequence length and in most cases for fixed computational budgets at LLM.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Structuring The Future: Diffusion LLM Speculative Decoding via Calibrated Draft Graphs

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spiffy speeds up diffusion LLM inference up to about 3x (and up to 7.9x with parallel decoding) by verifying multiple candidate unmasked states in one batched model call, while preserving greedy output.

  2. Efficient Speculative Decoding for Llama at Scale: Challenges and Solutions

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Meta reports EAGLE-based speculative decoding optimizations for Llama models, achieving state-of-the-art latency (about 4 ms/token for Llama4 Maverick) and 1.4-2.0x speedups for large batches.

  3. Advancing Decoding Strategies: Enhancements in Locally Typical Sampling for LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    ASTS extends locally typical sampling with semantic scoring and dynamic thresholds, reporting improved perplexity, MAUVE, and diversity on story and summarization tasks.

  4. SpecASR: Accelerating LLM-based Automatic Speech Recognition via Speculative Decoding

    eess.AS 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SpecASR accelerates LLM-based ASR by 3.04x-3.79x over autoregressive decoding using adaptive draft lengths, draft token recycling, and sparse token trees, but the speedups are simulated from Whisper proxy models rathe...

Pith tools