Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

AmbigNLG: Addressing Task Ambiguity in Instruction for NLG

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.17717 v4 pith:YH2YIVFS submitted 2024-02-27 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords ambiguitytaskllmsambignlginstructionsaddressinginstructioninteractive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce AmbigNLG, a novel task designed to tackle the challenge of task ambiguity in instructions for Natural Language Generation (NLG). Ambiguous instructions often impede the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), especially in complex NLG tasks. To tackle this issue, we propose an ambiguity taxonomy that categorizes different types of instruction ambiguities and refines initial instructions with clearer specifications. Accompanying this task, we present AmbigSNI-NLG, a dataset comprising 2,500 instances annotated to facilitate research in AmbigNLG. Through comprehensive experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs, we demonstrate that our method significantly enhances the alignment of generated text with user expectations, achieving up to a 15.02-point increase in ROUGE scores. Our findings highlight the critical importance of addressing task ambiguity to fully harness the capabilities of LLMs in NLG tasks. Furthermore, we confirm the effectiveness of our method in practical settings involving interactive ambiguity mitigation with users, underscoring the benefits of leveraging LLMs for interactive clarification.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Next-Token Prediction Should be Ambiguity-Sensitive: A Meta-Learning Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Transformers systematically deviate from the Bayes-optimal predictor under high-ambiguity contexts on a new HMM benchmark, and a Monte Carlo predictor that decouples task inference from token prediction partly closes ...

  2. LLM-based ambiguity detection in natural language instructions for collaborative surgical robots

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An ensemble of five LLM evaluators plus conformal prediction labeled surgical instructions as ambiguous or clear with 70% (Llama 3.2 11B) and 82.5% (Gemma 3 12B) accuracy, measured in-sample on the 40-instruction cali...

Pith tools