REVIEW 2 cited by
OCEL (Object-Centric Event Log) 2.0 Specification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Object-Centric Event Logs (OCELs) form the basis for Object-Centric Process Mining (OCPM). OCEL 1.0 was first released in 2020 and triggered the development of a range of OCPM techniques. OCEL 2.0 forms the new, more expressive standard, allowing for more extensive process analyses while remaining in an easily exchangeable format. In contrast to the first OCEL standard, it can depict changes in objects, provide information on object relationships, and qualify these relationships to other objects or specific events. Compared to XES, it is more expressive, less complicated, and better readable. OCEL 2.0 offers three exchange formats: a relational database (SQLite), XML, and JSON format. This OCEL 2.0 specification document provides an introduction to the standard, its metamodel, and its exchange formats, aimed at practitioners and researchers alike.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
An ER-Model-Based Framework for Case Notion Selection in Object-Centric Processes
An ER-schema-guided framework defines process cases as connected components of a graph over primary and secondary entity objects, after excluding resource and parent entities.
-
Leveraging GPT-4o Efficiency for Detecting Rework Anomaly in Business Processes
GPT-4o achieves 74-98% accuracy on synthetic rework anomaly detection depending on prompt type and anomaly distribution, but the prompt examples leak from the test set.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.