REVIEW 3 cited by
FENICE: Factuality Evaluation of summarization based on Natural language Inference and Claim Extraction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in text summarization, particularly with the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), have shown remarkable performance. However, a notable challenge persists as a substantial number of automatically-generated summaries exhibit factual inconsistencies, such as hallucinations. In response to this issue, various approaches for the evaluation of consistency for summarization have emerged. Yet, these newly-introduced metrics face several limitations, including lack of interpretability, focus on short document summaries (e.g., news articles), and computational impracticality, especially for LLM-based metrics. To address these shortcomings, we propose Factuality Evaluation of summarization based on Natural language Inference and Claim Extraction (FENICE), a more interpretable and efficient factuality-oriented metric. FENICE leverages an NLI-based alignment between information in the source document and a set of atomic facts, referred to as claims, extracted from the summary. Our metric sets a new state of the art on AGGREFACT, the de-facto benchmark for factuality evaluation. Moreover, we extend our evaluation to a more challenging setting by conducting a human annotation process of long-form summarization. In the hope of fostering research in summarization factuality evaluation, we release the code of our metric and our factuality annotations of long-form summarization at https://github.com/Babelscape/FENICE.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
ARGUS: Hallucination and Omission Evaluation in Video-LLMs
ARGUS measures hallucination and omission in free-form video captions using LLM-based entailment and temporal alignment, finding that even the best video-LLM still produces roughly 40% hallucinated content.
-
Fact-Controlled Diagnosis of Hallucinations in Medical Text Summarization
A fact-alignment LLM method detects clinical summarization hallucinations better than existing metrics, with correlations of 0.43 on controlled data and 0.37 on natural errors.
-
Taming LLMs with Negative Samples: A Reference-Free Framework to Evaluate Presentation Content with Actionable Feedback
REFLEX fine-tunes Phi-3-Mini on synthetic negative presentations to produce reference-free scores and actionable feedback for slide quality across coverage, redundancy, text-image alignment, and flow.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.