REVIEW 1 cited by
Discrete Consensus-Based Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We propose Discrete Consensus-Based Optimization (DCBO), a fully discrete version of the Consensus-Based Optimization (CBO) framework. DCBO is a multi-agent method for the global optimization of possibly non-convex and non-differentiable functions. It aligns with the CBO paradigm, which promotes a consensus among agents towards a global optimum through simple stochastic dynamics amenable to rigorous mathematical analysis. Despite the promises, there has been a gap between the analysis of CBO and the actual behavior of the agents from its time-discrete implementation, as the former has focused on the system of continuous stochastic differential equations defining the model or its mean-field approximation. In particular, direct analysis of CBO-type algorithms with heterogeneous stochasticity is very challenging. DCBO distinguishes itself from these approaches in the sense that it has no continuous counterpart, thanks to the replacement of the "softmin" operator with the "hardmin" one, which is inherently discrete. Yet, it maintains the operational principles of CBO and allows for rich mathematical analysis. We present conditions, independent of the number of agents, for achieving a consensus or convergence and study the circumstances under which global optimization occurs. We test DCBO on a large number of benchmark functions to show its merits. We also demonstrate that DCBO is applicable to a diverse range of real-world problems, including neural network training, compressed sensing, and portfolio optimization, with competitive performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Consensus-based optimization for closed-box adversarial attacks and a connection to evolution strategies
Consensus-based optimization matches or beats natural evolution strategies as a closed-box adversarial attack method in easier attack scenarios, and consensus hopping is shown to be a gradient-descent-like limit of CBO.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.