Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Noise-mitigated randomized measurements and self-calibrating shadow estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04751 v1 pith:2CWOOIC6 submitted 2024-03-07 quant-ph cond-mat.othermath-phmath.MP

classification quant-phcond-mat.othermath-phmath.MP
keywords estimationmeasurementsrandomizedshadownoisequantumschemesaccessible
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Randomized measurements are increasingly appreciated as powerful tools to estimate properties of quantum systems, e.g., in the characterization of hybrid classical-quantum computation. On many platforms they constitute natively accessible measurements, serving as the building block of prominent schemes like shadow estimation. In the real world, however, the implementation of the random gates at the core of these schemes is susceptible to various sources of noise and imperfections, strongly limiting the applicability of protocols. To attenuate the impact of this shortcoming, in this work we introduce an error-mitigated method of randomized measurements, giving rise to a robust shadow estimation procedure. On the practical side, we show that error mitigation and shadow estimation can be carried out using the same session of quantum experiments, hence ensuring that we can address and mitigate the noise affecting the randomization measurements. Mathematically, we develop a picture derived from Fourier-transforms to connect randomized benchmarking and shadow estimation. We prove rigorous performance guarantees and show the functioning using comprehensive numerics. More conceptually, we demonstrate that, if properly used, easily accessible data from randomized benchmarking schemes already provide such valuable diagnostic information to inform about the noise dynamics and to assist in quantum learning procedures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Light-Cone Scaling of In-Circuit Noise in Randomized Measurements

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Local noise in shallow randomized measurements damps Pauli observables exponentially with operator size, with slope and intercept set by the operator's light cone, enabling small-string calibration of large-string estimates.

  2. Coherently mitigating boson samplers with stochastic errors

    quant-ph 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A coherent averaging protocol over randomly imperfect interferometers is proven to converge to the ideal boson sampling distribution, supported by a new trace distance bound for vacuum-heralded linear networks.

  3. Classical Shadows with Improved Median-of-Means Estimation

    quant-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Applying Minsker's tighter median-of-means estimator with incomplete U-statistics to classical shadows improves sample efficiency for Clifford measurements but not for Pauli measurements.

Pith tools