Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CLIcK: A Benchmark Dataset of Cultural and Linguistic Intelligence in Korean

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.06412 v4 pith:EF3YXQVK submitted 2024-03-11 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords koreanclickculturalbenchmarklanguagelinguisticcategoriesdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) for the Korean language, there remains an obvious lack of benchmark datasets that test the requisite Korean cultural and linguistic knowledge. Because many existing Korean benchmark datasets are derived from the English counterparts through translation, they often overlook the different cultural contexts. For the few benchmark datasets that are sourced from Korean data capturing cultural knowledge, only narrow tasks such as bias and hate speech detection are offered. To address this gap, we introduce a benchmark of Cultural and Linguistic Intelligence in Korean (CLIcK), a dataset comprising 1,995 QA pairs. CLIcK sources its data from official Korean exams and textbooks, partitioning the questions into eleven categories under the two main categories of language and culture. For each instance in CLIcK, we provide fine-grained annotation of which cultural and linguistic knowledge is required to answer the question correctly. Using CLIcK, we test 13 language models to assess their performance. Our evaluation uncovers insights into their performances across the categories, as well as the diverse factors affecting their comprehension. CLIcK offers the first large-scale comprehensive Korean-centric analysis of LLMs' proficiency in Korean culture and language.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nunchi-Bench: Benchmarking Language Models on Cultural Reasoning with a Focus on Korean Superstition

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark, Nunchi-Bench, shows that LLMs know Korean superstition facts but frequently fail to apply them in practical cultural contexts, and that explicit cultural framing beats prompt language alone.

  2. KNIGHT: Knowledge Graph-Driven Multiple-Choice Question Generation with Adaptive Hardness Calibration

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A reusable per-topic knowledge graph, built once from Wikipedia, lets an LLM generate multi-hop multiple-choice questions whose difficulty is set by path depth, with human-audited quality and model rankings that track MMLU.

  3. Opt.Gear Technical Report

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Opt.Gear is a family of efficient on-device language models using a ConvKV-gated mixer with sparse attention, trained on 0.5T tokens without distillation, claiming up to 4.9x NPU speedups and 20 TPS on a Cortex-M7.

Pith tools