Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

From Factor Models to Deep Learning: Machine Learning in Reshaping Empirical Asset Pricing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.06779 v1 pith:4HSXPK3L submitted 2024-03-11 q-fin.ST

classification q-fin.ST
keywords modelsassetlearningpricingcomplexitiesexploresfinancefinancial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper comprehensively reviews the application of machine learning (ML) and AI in finance, specifically in the context of asset pricing. It starts by summarizing the traditional asset pricing models and examining their limitations in capturing the complexities of financial markets. It explores how 1) ML models, including supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, and reinforcement learning, provide versatile frameworks to address these complexities, and 2) the incorporation of advanced ML algorithms into traditional financial models enhances return prediction and portfolio optimization. These methods can adapt to changing market dynamics by modeling structural changes and incorporating heterogeneous data sources, such as text and images. In addition, this paper explores challenges in applying ML in asset pricing, addressing the growing demand for explainability in decision-making and mitigating overfitting in complex models. This paper aims to provide insights into novel methodologies showcasing the potential of ML to reshape the future of quantitative finance.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Agentic Trading Systems Pay for Their Own Intelligence?

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Agentic trading viability is decided by whether LLM-mediated timing decisions cover their own induced costs; TradeLens attributes profit and cost from traces to diagnose this conversion.

  2. AlphaZeroBeta: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Market-Neutral Portfolios

    q-fin.PM 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A deep RL policy with a composite reward and hard dollar-neutral projection beat convex baselines on Sharpe with near-zero benchmark correlation in seven-equity-index walk-forward backtests.

Pith tools