Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A non-asymptotic theory of Kernel Ridge Regression: deterministic equivalents, test error, and GCV estimator

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.08938 v1 pith:ZZELYGXJ submitted 2024-03-13 stat.ML cs.LGmath.STstat.TH

classification stat.MLcs.LGmath.STstat.TH
keywords kernelerrortestdeterministicestimatornon-asymptoticridgesetting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider learning an unknown target function $f_*$ using kernel ridge regression (KRR) given i.i.d. data $(u_i,y_i)$, $i\leq n$, where $u_i \in U$ is a covariate vector and $y_i = f_* (u_i) +\varepsilon_i \in \mathbb{R}$. A recent string of work has empirically shown that the test error of KRR can be well approximated by a closed-form estimate derived from an `equivalent' sequence model that only depends on the spectrum of the kernel operator. However, a theoretical justification for this equivalence has so far relied either on restrictive assumptions -- such as subgaussian independent eigenfunctions -- , or asymptotic derivations for specific kernels in high dimensions. In this paper, we prove that this equivalence holds for a general class of problems satisfying some spectral and concentration properties on the kernel eigendecomposition. Specifically, we establish in this setting a non-asymptotic deterministic approximation for the test error of KRR -- with explicit non-asymptotic bounds -- that only depends on the eigenvalues and the target function alignment to the eigenvectors of the kernel. Our proofs rely on a careful derivation of deterministic equivalents for random matrix functionals in the dimension free regime pioneered by Cheng and Montanari (2022). We apply this setting to several classical examples and show an excellent agreement between theoretical predictions and numerical simulations. These results rely on having access to the eigendecomposition of the kernel operator. Alternatively, we prove that, under this same setting, the generalized cross-validation (GCV) estimator concentrates on the test error uniformly over a range of ridge regularization parameter that includes zero (the interpolating solution). As a consequence, the GCV estimator can be used to estimate from data the test error and optimal regularization parameter for KRR.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scaling Laws and Spectra of Shallow Neural Networks in the Feature Learning Regime

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For diagonal and quadratic two-layer networks, training maps to LASSO and matrix compressed sensing, yielding a full phase diagram of excess-risk scaling exponents and a spectral characterization of the trained weights.

  2. Towards a Statistical Understanding of Neural Networks: Beyond the Neural Tangent Kernel Theories

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper reviews fixed-kernel neural network theory and proposes an over-parameterized Gaussian sequence model as a prototype for feature learning.

Pith tools