Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Projected Forward Gradient-Guided Frank-Wolfe Algorithm via Variance Reduction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.12511 v3 pith:SACHEHST submitted 2024-03-19 cs.LG math.OC

classification cs.LGmath.OC
keywords projected-fgalgorithmapproachconvergenceforwardintroducesvarianceapplication
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper aims to enhance the use of the Frank-Wolfe (FW) algorithm for training deep neural networks. Similar to any gradient-based optimization algorithm, FW suffers from high computational and memory costs when computing gradients for DNNs. This paper introduces the application of the recently proposed projected forward gradient (Projected-FG) method to the FW framework, offering reduced computational cost similar to backpropagation and low memory utilization akin to forward propagation. Our results show that trivial application of the Projected-FG introduces non-vanishing convergence error due to the stochastic noise that the Projected-FG method introduces in the process. This noise results in an non-vanishing variance in the Projected-FG estimated gradient. To address this, we propose a variance reduction approach by aggregating historical Projected-FG directions. We demonstrate rigorously that this approach ensures convergence to the optimal solution for convex functions and to a stationary point for non-convex functions. These convergence properties are validated through a numerical example, showcasing the approach's effectiveness and efficiency.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Memory Savings at What Cost? A Study of Alternatives to Backpropagation

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Checkpointed backpropagation beats forward-mode AD and zero-order optimization in accuracy, convergence speed, and compute for LLM fine-tuning, undermining claims that the alternatives are practical memory savers.

Pith tools