Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

PuzzleVQA: Diagnosing Multimodal Reasoning Challenges of Language Models with Abstract Visual Patterns

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.13315 v3 pith:FQRFPEYR submitted 2024-03-20 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords modelsmultimodalreasoninglargepatternsabstractpuzzlevqathey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large multimodal models extend the impressive capabilities of large language models by integrating multimodal understanding abilities. However, it is not clear how they can emulate the general intelligence and reasoning ability of humans. As recognizing patterns and abstracting concepts are key to general intelligence, we introduce PuzzleVQA, a collection of 2000 puzzle instances based on abstract patterns. With this dataset, we evaluate large multimodal models with abstract patterns based on fundamental concepts, including colors, numbers, sizes, and shapes. Through our experiments on state-of-the-art large multimodal models, we find that they are not able to generalize well to simple abstract patterns. Notably, GPT-4V achieves a score of 46.4% on single-concept puzzles, which shows that state-of-the-art models struggle on our dataset. To diagnose the reasoning challenges in large multimodal models, we progressively guide the models with our ground truth reasoning explanations for visual perception, inductive reasoning, and deductive reasoning. Our systematic analysis finds that the main bottlenecks of GPT-4V are weaker visual perception and inductive reasoning abilities. Through this work, we hope to shed light on the limitations of large multimodal models and how they can better emulate human cognitive processes in the future. Our data and code are available at https://puzzlevqa.github.io

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Trace: A Taxonomy-Guided Environment for Multidomain Visual Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RLVR training on 64,000 procedurally generated Trace instances improves Qwen2.5-VL macro-average on 24 external visual reasoning benchmarks by 3.51 points at 3B and 4.06 points at 7B.

  2. MARBLE: A Hard Benchmark for Multimodal Spatial Reasoning and Planning

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    State-of-the-art multimodal language models perform at or near random chance on MARBLE, a new hard benchmark for spatial reasoning and planning.

  3. MME-Reasoning: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Logical Reasoning in MLLMs

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 1,188-question multimodal benchmark covering deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning shows that leading MLLMs score around 60% and are especially weak at abductive reasoning.

  4. LaCo: Efficient Layer-wise Compression of Visual Tokens for Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Inserting a pixel-shuffle plus residual patch-merge layer inside the vision encoder compresses visual tokens more efficiently than post-encoder compression, at modest accuracy cost.

  5. The Jumping Reasoning Curve? Tracking the Evolution of Reasoning Performance in GPT-[n] and o-[n] Models on Multimodal Puzzles

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Later OpenAI o-series models substantially outperform GPT-series models on multimodal puzzles, but fine-grained visual perception and algorithmic puzzles remain hard.

Pith tools