Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Common Ground Tracking in Multimodal Dialogue

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.17284 v1 pith:TGW2TO24 submitted 2024-03-26 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords dialoguegroundcommonsharedtrackingbeliefconstructionfeatures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Within Dialogue Modeling research in AI and NLP, considerable attention has been spent on ``dialogue state tracking'' (DST), which is the ability to update the representations of the speaker's needs at each turn in the dialogue by taking into account the past dialogue moves and history. Less studied but just as important to dialogue modeling, however, is ``common ground tracking'' (CGT), which identifies the shared belief space held by all of the participants in a task-oriented dialogue: the task-relevant propositions all participants accept as true. In this paper we present a method for automatically identifying the current set of shared beliefs and ``questions under discussion'' (QUDs) of a group with a shared goal. We annotate a dataset of multimodal interactions in a shared physical space with speech transcriptions, prosodic features, gestures, actions, and facets of collaboration, and operationalize these features for use in a deep neural model to predict moves toward construction of common ground. Model outputs cascade into a set of formal closure rules derived from situated evidence and belief axioms and update operations. We empirically assess the contribution of each feature type toward successful construction of common ground relative to ground truth, establishing a benchmark in this novel, challenging task.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Exploration of Internal States in Collaborative Problem Solving

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a Lego-based collaborative task, participants' retrospective verbal reports show distinct linguistic patterns, with positive emotion labels such as 'Engaged' and 'Optimistic' appearing most frequently.

  2. Dynamic Epistemic Friction in Dialogue

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A vector-based belief-update model, grounded in dynamic epistemic logic, predicts final block-weight beliefs in a collaborative task from dialogue friction.

  3. A Methodological Framework for Capturing Cognitive-Affective States in Collaborative Learning

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A pilot study combines self-caught and probe-caught retrospective reporting to measure cognitive-affective states during collaborative learning, finding Optimistic, Curious, and Confused most frequent.

Pith tools