REVIEW 3 cited by
AIGIQA-20K: A Large Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the rapid advancements in AI-Generated Content (AIGC), AI-Generated Images (AIGIs) have been widely applied in entertainment, education, and social media. However, due to the significant variance in quality among different AIGIs, there is an urgent need for models that consistently match human subjective ratings. To address this issue, we organized a challenge towards AIGC quality assessment on NTIRE 2024 that extensively considers 15 popular generative models, utilizing dynamic hyper-parameters (including classifier-free guidance, iteration epochs, and output image resolution), and gather subjective scores that consider perceptual quality and text-to-image alignment altogether comprehensively involving 21 subjects. This approach culminates in the creation of the largest fine-grained AIGI subjective quality database to date with 20,000 AIGIs and 420,000 subjective ratings, known as AIGIQA-20K. Furthermore, we conduct benchmark experiments on this database to assess the correspondence between 16 mainstream AIGI quality models and human perception. We anticipate that this large-scale quality database will inspire robust quality indicators for AIGIs and propel the evolution of AIGC for vision. The database is released on https://www.modelscope.cn/datasets/lcysyzxdxc/AIGCQA-30K-Image.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
AU-IQA: A Benchmark Dataset for Perceptual Quality Assessment of AI-Enhanced User-Generated Content
AU-IQA is a new 4,800-image benchmark showing existing quality models, mainly those trained on ordinary user content, only partially predict human ratings of AI-enhanced photos.
-
Who is a Better Talker: Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for AI-Generated Talking Heads
A new large dataset and the FSCD model improve automated quality scoring of AI-generated talking-head videos, beating 15 baselines in correlation with human ratings.
-
RAISE: Realness Assessment for Image Synthesis and Evaluation
RAISE is a new 600-image benchmark with human realness scores for real and Stable Diffusion images, plus baseline predictors reaching about 0.68 Spearman correlation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.