No Panacea in Planning: Algorithm Selection for Suboptimal Multi-Agent Path Finding

Since more and more algorithms are proposed for multi-agent path finding (MAPF) and each of them has its strengths, choosing the correct one for a specific scenario that fulfills some specified requirements is an important task. Previous research in algorithm selection for MAPF built a standard workflow and showed that machine learning can help. In this paper, we study general solvers for MAPF, which further include suboptimal algorithms. We propose different groups of optimization objectives and learning tasks to handle the new tradeoff between runtime and solution quality. We conduct extensive experiments to show that the same loss can not be used for different groups of optimization objectives, and that standard computer vision models are no worse than customized architecture. We also provide insightful discussions on how feature-sensitive pre-processing is needed for learning for MAPF, and how different learning metrics are correlated to different learning tasks.