REVIEW 1 cited by
A Systematic Literature Survey of Sparse Matrix-Vector Multiplication
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Sparse matrix-vector multiplication (SpMV) is a crucial computing kernel with widespread applications in iterative algorithms. Over the past decades, research on SpMV optimization has made remarkable strides, giving rise to various optimization contributions. However, the comprehensive and systematic literature survey that introduces, analyzes, discusses, and summarizes the advancements of SpMV in recent years is currently lacking. Aiming to fill this gap, this paper compares existing techniques and analyzes their strengths and weaknesses. We begin by highlighting two representative applications of SpMV, then conduct an in-depth overview of the important techniques that optimize SpMV on modern architectures, which we specifically classify as classic, auto-tuning, machine learning, and mixed-precision-based optimization. We also elaborate on the hardware-based architectures, including CPU, GPU, FPGA, processing in Memory, heterogeneous, and distributed platforms. We present a comprehensive experimental evaluation that compares the performance of state-of-the-art SpMV implementations. Based on our findings, we identify several challenges and point out future research directions. This survey is intended to provide researchers with a comprehensive understanding of SpMV optimization on modern architectures and provide guidance for future work.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Comparative Study of Pruning Methods in Transformer-based Time Series Forecasting
A benchmark shows most time-series Transformers tolerate about 50% unstructured pruning without clear accuracy loss, while structured pruning rarely delivers meaningful inference speedups.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.