REVIEW 3 cited by
Impact of Preference Noise on the Alignment Performance of Generative Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A key requirement in developing Generative Language Models (GLMs) is to have their values aligned with human values. Preference-based alignment is a widely used paradigm for this purpose, in which preferences over generation pairs are first elicited from human annotators or AI systems, and then fed into some alignment techniques, e.g., Direct Preference Optimization. However, a substantial percent (20 - 40%) of the preference pairs used in GLM alignment are noisy, and it remains unclear how the noise affects the alignment performance and how to mitigate its negative impact. In this paper, we propose a framework to inject desirable amounts and types of noise to the preferences, and systematically study the impact of preference noise on the alignment performance in two tasks (summarization and dialogue generation). We find that the alignment performance can be highly sensitive to the noise rates in the preference data: e.g., a 10 percentage points (pp) increase of the noise rate can lead to 30 pp drop in the alignment performance (in win rate). To mitigate the impact of noise, confidence-based data filtering shows significant benefit when certain types of noise are present. We hope our work can help the community better understand and mitigate the impact of preference noise in GLM alignment.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Metadata-Free Meta-Reweighted Direct Preference Optimization under Noisy Preference Labels
Under 20–40% random preference-label flips, PACMR-DPO—a VNet-reweighted DPO with a prompt-augmentation-consistency meta-objective and central-difference LoRA meta-gradients—outperforms cDPO, IPO, rDPO, and Dr.DPO in j...
-
Influence Functions for Preference Dataset Pruning
Conjugate-gradient influence functions can mildly improve reward-model accuracy after pruning 10% of a preference dataset, but the gain is not statistically significant and gradient similarity better identifies helpfu...
-
On Symmetric Losses for Robust Policy Optimization with Noisy Preferences
Symmetric losses preserve action rankings under symmetric label noise, and the paper's claim that they also handle asymmetric noise is invalid.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.