REVIEW 2 cited by
LLMs4OM: Matching Ontologies with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Ontology Matching (OM), is a critical task in knowledge integration, where aligning heterogeneous ontologies facilitates data interoperability and knowledge sharing. Traditional OM systems often rely on expert knowledge or predictive models, with limited exploration of the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs). We present the LLMs4OM framework, a novel approach to evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs in OM tasks. This framework utilizes two modules for retrieval and matching, respectively, enhanced by zero-shot prompting across three ontology representations: concept, concept-parent, and concept-children. Through comprehensive evaluations using 20 OM datasets from various domains, we demonstrate that LLMs, under the LLMs4OM framework, can match and even surpass the performance of traditional OM systems, particularly in complex matching scenarios. Our results highlight the potential of LLMs to significantly contribute to the field of OM.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
AgentMap: Joint Equivalence and Subsumption Discovery for Ontology Matching
Hybrid Ontology Matching jointly finds equivalence or the finest subsumer per source concept; AgentMap’s staged multi-agent search beats single-shot LLM and classic OM baselines on four extended biomedical/food benchmarks.
-
Addressing Longstanding Challenges in Cognitive Science with Language Models
A review proposes that LLMs can serve as tools for a more integrative and cumulative cognitive science when used under human oversight.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.