Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Physical Backdoor Attack can Jeopardize Driving with Vision-Large-Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.12916 v2 pith:DH33MINY submitted 2024-04-19 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords badvlmdriverautonomousbackdoordrivingvlmsattackphysicalacceleration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision-Large-Language-models(VLMs) have great application prospects in autonomous driving. Despite the ability of VLMs to comprehend and make decisions in complex scenarios, their integration into safety-critical autonomous driving systems poses serious security risks. In this paper, we propose BadVLMDriver, the first backdoor attack against VLMs for autonomous driving that can be launched in practice using physical objects. Unlike existing backdoor attacks against VLMs that rely on digital modifications, BadVLMDriver uses common physical items, such as a red balloon, to induce unsafe actions like sudden acceleration, highlighting a significant real-world threat to autonomous vehicle safety. To execute BadVLMDriver, we develop an automated pipeline utilizing natural language instructions to generate backdoor training samples with embedded malicious behaviors. This approach allows for flexible trigger and behavior selection, enhancing the stealth and practicality of the attack in diverse scenarios. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate BadVLMDriver for two representative VLMs, five different trigger objects, and two types of malicious backdoor behaviors. BadVLMDriver achieves a 92% attack success rate in inducing a sudden acceleration when coming across a pedestrian holding a red balloon. Thus, BadVLMDriver not only demonstrates a critical security risk but also emphasizes the urgent need for developing robust defense mechanisms to protect against such vulnerabilities in autonomous driving technologies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Backdoor Cleaning without External Guidance in MLLM Fine-tuning

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BYE filters backdoored training images from MLLM fine-tuning by clustering low attention entropy across selected layers.

  2. Security of World-Model-Based Embodied AI: A Lifecycle of Threats, Defenses, and Evaluation

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    World-model-based embodied AI creates a predictive security boundary where attacks on data, sensors, imagination, ranking, and feedback can turn into unsafe physical action and false safety certificates.

  3. A Survey of Safety on Large Vision-Language Models: Attacks, Defenses and Evaluations

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of LVLM safety that adds a lifecycle taxonomy and new benchmark results showing Janus-Pro-7B has weaker safety than several open-source LVLMs.

  4. When Data Manipulation Meets Attack Goals: An In-depth Survey of Attacks for VLMs

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that classifies VLM attacks by goal and data manipulation strategy, and reviews defenses and metrics.

  5. Empowering Multimodal LLMs with External Tools: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey paper maps how external tools are used to augment multimodal large language models across data, tasks, evaluation, and future directions.

Pith tools