REVIEW 3 cited by
AutoGluon-Multimodal (AutoMM): Supercharging Multimodal AutoML with Foundation Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
AutoGluon-Multimodal (AutoMM) is introduced as an open-source AutoML library designed specifically for multimodal learning. Distinguished by its exceptional ease of use, AutoMM enables fine-tuning of foundation models with just three lines of code. Supporting various modalities including image, text, and tabular data, both independently and in combination, the library offers a comprehensive suite of functionalities spanning classification, regression, object detection, semantic matching, and image segmentation. Experiments across diverse datasets and tasks showcases AutoMM's superior performance in basic classification and regression tasks compared to existing AutoML tools, while also demonstrating competitive results in advanced tasks, aligning with specialized toolboxes designed for such purposes.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Quickly Tuning Foundation Models for Image Segmentation
Meta-learning over dataset features and learning curves lets QTT-SEG find SAM fine-tuning configurations that beat zero-shot and a strong AutoML baseline in under three minutes.
-
Towards Benchmarking Foundation Models for Tabular Data With Text
A new 13-dataset benchmark shows that adding text embeddings to tabular models usually improves accuracy, but no embedding or downsampling strategy dominates.
-
BioAutoML-NAS: An End-to-End AutoML Framework for Multimodal Insect Classification via Neural Architecture Search on Large-Scale Biodiversity Data
An AutoML/NAS insect classifier that feeds the target order labels into its metadata encoder, making the reported 96.81% accuracy uninformative.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.