Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

CoMM: Collaborative Multi-Agent, Multi-Reasoning-Path Prompting for Complex Problem Solving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.17729 v1 pith:AHJN4G2T submitted 2024-04-26 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords differentpromptingllmsmulti-agentreasoningrolessolvingability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great ability in solving traditional natural language tasks and elementary reasoning tasks with appropriate prompting techniques. However, their ability is still limited in solving complicated science problems. In this work, we aim to push the upper bound of the reasoning capability of LLMs by proposing a collaborative multi-agent, multi-reasoning-path (CoMM) prompting framework. Specifically, we prompt LLMs to play different roles in a problem-solving team, and encourage different role-play agents to collaboratively solve the target task. In particular, we discover that applying different reasoning paths for different roles is an effective strategy to implement few-shot prompting approaches in the multi-agent scenarios. Empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods on two college-level science problems over competitive baselines. Our further analysis shows the necessity of prompting LLMs to play different roles or experts independently. We release the code at: https://github.com/amazon-science/comm-prompt

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning from Peers in Reasoning Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sharing intermediate summaries between parallel reasoning paths during generation improves reasoning-model accuracy and helps models recover from bad starts.

  2. Synergizing Logical Reasoning, Knowledge Management and Collaboration in Multi-Agent LLM System

    cs.MA 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SynergyMAS combines a graph database with a Clingo logic solver, corrective RAG, and Theory of Mind prompts in a hierarchical multi-agent team, demonstrated on a Smart Home Energy Management case study.

  3. Trace-of-Thought Prompting: Investigating Prompt-Based Knowledge Distillation Through Question Decomposition

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A two-stage prompting method where a large model generates solution steps and a smaller model follows them; GSM8K gains are significant, MATH gains are not.

  4. Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Multi-Path Collaborative Reactive and Reflection agents

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-path, reactive-plus-reflection agent framework improves gpt-3.5-turbo accuracy on MMLU physics, math, and moral reasoning subsets compared with CoT, self-consistency, and self-refine baselines.

Pith tools