Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Investigating Automatic Scoring and Feedback using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.00602 v1 pith:QB3EKPAO submitted 2024-05-01 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords feedbackllmsmodelsautomaticfine-tuninghighlanguagetasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic grading and feedback have been long studied using traditional machine learning and deep learning techniques using language models. With the recent accessibility to high performing large language models (LLMs) like LLaMA-2, there is an opportunity to investigate the use of these LLMs for automatic grading and feedback generation. Despite the increase in performance, LLMs require significant computational resources for fine-tuning and additional specific adjustments to enhance their performance for such tasks. To address these issues, Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning (PEFT) methods, such as LoRA and QLoRA, have been adopted to decrease memory and computational requirements in model fine-tuning. This paper explores the efficacy of PEFT-based quantized models, employing classification or regression head, to fine-tune LLMs for automatically assigning continuous numerical grades to short answers and essays, as well as generating corresponding feedback. We conducted experiments on both proprietary and open-source datasets for our tasks. The results show that prediction of grade scores via finetuned LLMs are highly accurate, achieving less than 3% error in grade percentage on average. For providing graded feedback fine-tuned 4-bit quantized LLaMA-2 13B models outperform competitive base models and achieve high similarity with subject matter expert feedback in terms of high BLEU and ROUGE scores and qualitatively in terms of feedback. The findings from this study provide important insights into the impacts of the emerging capabilities of using quantization approaches to fine-tune LLMs for various downstream tasks, such as automatic short answer scoring and feedback generation at comparatively lower costs and latency.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 3 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. How well can LLMs Grade Essays in Arabic?

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Generative LLMs, including Arabic-specific ones, underperform a fine-tuned BERT model on Arabic essay scoring, with bilingual prompting giving the best LLM results.

  2. Automated Assignment Grading with Large Language Models: Insights From a Bioinformatics Course

    cs.LG 2025-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a semester-long bioinformatics course, LLM graders with hand-tuned rubrics and examples graded written answers in 85 to 90 percent agreement with human TAs, but the accuracy was measured on the same set used to des...

Pith tools