Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Addressing Topic Granularity and Hallucination in Large Language Models for Topic Modelling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.00611 v1 pith:XIUD6WKM submitted 2024-05-01 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords topictopicsllmsmodellingaddressingapproachgranularityhuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) with their strong zero-shot topic extraction capabilities offer an alternative to probabilistic topic modelling and closed-set topic classification approaches. As zero-shot topic extractors, LLMs are expected to understand human instructions to generate relevant and non-hallucinated topics based on the given documents. However, LLM-based topic modelling approaches often face difficulties in generating topics with adherence to granularity as specified in human instructions, often resulting in many near-duplicate topics. Furthermore, methods for addressing hallucinated topics generated by LLMs have not yet been investigated. In this paper, we focus on addressing the issues of topic granularity and hallucinations for better LLM-based topic modelling. To this end, we introduce a novel approach that leverages Direct Preference Optimisation (DPO) to fine-tune open-source LLMs, such as Mistral-7B. Our approach does not rely on traditional human annotation to rank preferred answers but employs a reconstruction pipeline to modify raw topics generated by LLMs, thus enabling a fast and efficient training and inference framework. Comparative experiments show that our fine-tuning approach not only significantly improves the LLM's capability to produce more coherent, relevant, and precise topics, but also reduces the number of hallucinated topics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bridging the Evaluation Gap: Leveraging Large Language Models for Topic Model Evaluation

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-based metrics for coherence, repetitiveness, diversity, and topic-document alignment rate topic models, but scores shift substantially depending on which LLM does the judging.

  2. GeoMoE: Divide-and-Conquer Motion Field Modeling with Mixture-of-Experts for Two-View Geometry

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper as submitted does not contain the GeoMoE method or experiments, so the stated two-view geometry result is unverifiable.

Pith tools