REVIEW 3 cited by
Solar Radio Bursts and Space Weather
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Space Weather is the study of the conditions in the solar wind that can affect life on the surface of the Earth, particularly the increasingly technologically sophisticated devices that are part of modern life. Solar radio observations are relevant to such phenomena because they generally originate as events in the solar atmosphere, including flares, coronal mass ejections and shocks, that produce electromagnetic and particle radiations that impact the Earth. Low frequency solar radio emission arises in the solar atmosphere at the levels where these events occur: we can use frequency as a direct measure of density, and an indirect measure of height, in the atmosphere. The main radio burst types are described and illustrated using data from the Green Bank Solar Radio Burst Spectrometer, and their potential use as diagnostics of Space Weather is discussed.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Continuous Ultra-Low-Frequency Solar Radio Monitoring with ALBATROS from the High Arctic
ALBATROS, an eight-station Arctic radio array, detected solar radio bursts across 1–125 MHz, saw the same bursts at all stations, and found them correlated with GOES soft X-ray flares.
-
e-CALLISTO FITS Analyzer: A Software Framework for CALLISTO Solar Radio Data
An open-source GUI that merges, cleans, and analyzes e-CALLISTO solar radio spectra to measure Type II burst drift rates and Newkirk-model shock speeds.
-
Automated Solar Radio Burst Detection Using Deep Learning on Augmented e-Callisto Data
FlareSense, a ResNet detector trained on 304,750 e-Callisto spectrograms with SpecAugment and TimeWarp, reaches 93% precision and 73.15% recall, outperforming routine expert cataloging at matched precision.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.