REVIEW 2 cited by
Open Implementation and Study of BEST-RQ for Speech Processing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) has proven to be useful in various speech tasks. However, these methods are generally very demanding in terms of data, memory, and computational resources. BERT-based Speech pre-Training with Random-projection Quantizer (BEST-RQ), is an SSL method that has shown great performance on Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) while being simpler than other SSL methods, such as wav2vec 2.0. Despite BEST-RQ's great performance, details are lacking in the original paper, such as the amount of GPU/TPU hours used in pre-training, and there is no official easy-to-use open-source implementation. Furthermore, BEST-RQ has not been evaluated on other downstream tasks aside from ASR and speech translation. In this work, we describe a re-implementation of a Random-projection quantizer and perform a preliminary study with a comparison to wav2vec 2.0 on four downstream tasks. We discuss the details and differences of our implementation. We show that a random projection quantizer can achieve similar downstream performance as wav2vec 2.0 while decreasing training time by over a factor of two.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
HASRD: Hierarchical Acoustic and Semantic Representation Disentanglement
HASRD factorizes SSL speech representations into a first semantic codebook and residual acoustic codebooks, reporting improved ASR and reconstruction at 3.1 kbps versus SpeechTokenizer's 6.0 kbps.
-
Towards Early Prediction of Self-Supervised Speech Model Performance
Rank and clustering metrics on SSL speech embeddings predict downstream ASR and SV performance better than the pre-training loss, especially for in-domain ASR.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.