Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Towards Accurate and Efficient Document Analytics with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.04674 v1 pith:ZJ53YKRC submitted 2024-05-07 cs.DB

classification cs.DB
keywords documentsdocumentquerycollectionssemanticunstructuredzendbaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Unstructured data formats account for over 80% of the data currently stored, and extracting value from such formats remains a considerable challenge. In particular, current approaches for managing unstructured documents do not support ad-hoc analytical queries on document collections. Moreover, Large Language Models (LLMs) directly applied to the documents themselves, or on portions of documents through a process of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), fail to provide high accuracy query results, and in the LLM-only case, additionally incur high costs. Since many unstructured documents in a collection often follow similar templates that impart a common semantic structure, we introduce ZenDB, a document analytics system that leverages this semantic structure, coupled with LLMs, to answer ad-hoc SQL queries on document collections. ZenDB efficiently extracts semantic hierarchical structures from such templatized documents, and introduces a novel query engine that leverages these structures for accurate and cost-effective query execution. Users can impose a schema on their documents, and query it, all via SQL. Extensive experiments on three real-world document collections demonstrate ZenDB's benefits, achieving up to 30% cost savings compared to LLM-based baselines, while maintaining or improving accuracy, and surpassing RAG-based baselines by up to 61% in precision and 80% in recall, at a marginally higher cost.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AnnoRetrieve: Efficient Structured Retrieval for Unstructured Document Analysis

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    AnnoRetrieve uses auto-generated structured schemas and queries to retrieve information from unstructured documents more efficiently and accurately than embedding-based methods.

  2. Cut Costs, Not Accuracy: LLM-Powered Data Processing with Guarantees

    cs.DB 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    BARGAIN uses betting-based anytime-valid tests and adaptive, target-aware sampling to set model-cascade thresholds, delivering non-asymptotic quality guarantees and up to 86% greater cost savings than SUPG.

  3. QUEST: Query Optimization in Unstructured Document Analysis

    cs.DB 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    QUEST reduces LLM extraction cost in unstructured document analytics by retrieving only relevant segments via a two-level index and by generating per-document filter and join execution plans during query execution.

  4. A Survey on Open Dataset Search in the LLM Era: Retrospectives and Perspectives

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A structured review of open dataset search across tabular, spatial, JSON, graph, and vector data, plus the two-way relationship with LLMs.

Pith tools