Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

PolygloToxicityPrompts: Multilingual Evaluation of Neural Toxic Degeneration in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.09373 v3 pith:7MDB46VN submitted 2024-05-15 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords toxicitylanguagelanguagesllmsmultilingualpreference-tuningevaluationimpact
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to their extensive global deployment, and ensuring their safety calls for comprehensive and multilingual toxicity evaluations. However, existing toxicity benchmarks are overwhelmingly focused on English, posing serious risks to deploying LLMs in other languages. We address this by introducing PolygloToxicityPrompts (PTP), the first large-scale multilingual toxicity evaluation benchmark of 425K naturally occurring prompts spanning 17 languages. We overcome the scarcity of naturally occurring toxicity in web-text and ensure coverage across languages with varying resources by automatically scraping over 100M web-text documents. Using PTP, we investigate research questions to study the impact of model size, prompt language, and instruction and preference-tuning methods on toxicity by benchmarking over 60 LLMs. Notably, we find that toxicity increases as language resources decrease or model size increases. Although instruction- and preference-tuning reduce toxicity, the choice of preference-tuning method does not have any significant impact. Our findings shed light on crucial shortcomings of LLM safeguarding and highlight areas for future research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unintended Harms of Value-Aligned LLMs: Psychological and Empirical Insights

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Value-aligned LLMs become more harmful on average, and the specific safety categories that worsen depend on which human value the model was trained to emulate.

  2. Alignment at Pre-training! Towards Native Alignment for Arabic LLMs

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Rewriting Arabic pre-training data with aligned LLM workers improves safety, helpfulness, and Arabic benchmark scores in the released LLaMA3-Tamed models.

  3. The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured survey of LLM safety evaluation that proposes a why/what/where/how taxonomy and catalogs metrics, datasets, benchmarks, evaluators, and frameworks.

Pith tools