Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Phishing Email Detection Using Inputs From Artificial Intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.12494 v1 pith:XRXQMXS2 submitted 2024-05-21 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords trainingdetectionenterpriselabelsphishinghumansecurityattacks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Enterprise security is increasingly being threatened by social engineering attacks, such as phishing, which deceive employees into giving access to enterprise data. To protect both the users themselves and enterprise data, more and more organizations provide cyber security training that seeks to teach employees/customers to identify and report suspicious content. By its very nature, such training seeks to focus on signals that are likely to persist across a wide range of attacks. Further, it expects the user to apply the learnings from these training on e-mail messages that were not filtered by existing, automatic enterprise security (e.g., spam filters and commercial phishing detection software). However, relying on such training now shifts the detection of phishing from an automatic process to a human driven one which is fallible especially when a user errs due to distraction, forgetfulness, etc. In this work we explore treating this type of detection as a natural language processing task and modifying training pipelines accordingly. We present a dataset with annotated labels where these labels are created from the classes of signals that users are typically asked to identify in such training. We also present baseline classifier models trained on these classes of labels. With a comparative analysis of performance between human annotators and the models on these labels, we provide insights which can contribute to the improvement of the respective curricula for both machine and human training.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bridging Expertise Gaps: The Role of LLMs in Human-AI Collaboration for Cybersecurity

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In n=58 non-expert participants, human-AI collaboration improved phishing precision and intrusion recall, with confident LLM responses strongly influencing user decisions.

Pith tools